Unplanned downtime costs manufacturers over $50 billion annually. To avoid becoming part of that statistic, organizations must adopt a proactive equipment maintenance strategy-one built on robust, AI-driven Equipment Maintenance Management.
When executed effectively, this strategy not only saves money but also boosts production reliability. It extends equipment lifespan, improves machine availability, and significantly reduces the risk of unexpected failures. All of this is made possible by maintaining a complete, context-rich view of your assets-from design through to decommissioning.
What is Equipment Maintenance Management?
Equipment Maintenance Management is the process of planning, scheduling, performing, and tracking maintenance activities to ensure machinery operates efficiently and reliably. This includes preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance—all optimized when driven by comprehensive and trustworthy data.
The proactive approach, fueled by comprehensive asset lifecycle data, is fundamental to sustaining high operational standards. The primary objectives are to extend machinery’s lifespan, reduce downtime, and minimize repair costs, leveraging insights drawn from its entire operational history and even design intent. By maintaining equipment regularly, informed by its lifecycle data, facilities achieve higher efficiency and safety. It ensures that production processes run smoothly and reliably. Moreover, effective maintenance helps manufacturers comply with safety regulations while improving the return on investment in expensive manufacturing equipment through optimized performance and longevity.
Today, proactive maintenance approaches—supported by complete asset lifecycle data—are essential for sustaining operational excellence.
Lifecycle data enables facilities to:
-
Extend machinery life
-
Minimize downtime and repair costs
-
Enhance safety and regulatory compliance
-
Maximize return on capital investments
By using data to inform maintenance decisions, manufacturers ensure smoother operations and long-term equipment reliability.
The Challenges in Traditional Maintenance Management
-
Fragmented and inconsistent data from multiple systems
-
Poor visibility into asset condition and history
-
Inefficient maintenance schedules leading to downtime
-
Manual, error-prone documentation processes
-
Difficulty tracking parts, BOM changes, and supplier details
Types of Equipment Maintenance
Effective equipment maintenance management ensures assets operate smoothly, reduce downtime, and extend lifecycle value. Maintenance strategies vary depending on asset criticality, cost, and operational needs. Here are the main types of equipment maintenance:
1. Preventive Maintenance (PM)
Maintenance activities scheduled at regular intervals to prevent equipment failure before it occurs. It involves inspections, lubrication, adjustments, and parts replacement based on time or usage thresholds.
-
Goal: Minimize unexpected breakdowns by routine upkeep.
-
Examples: Changing filters every 3 months, scheduled lubrication every 500 hours of operation.
2. Predictive Maintenance (PdM)
Uses real-time data, sensors, and analytics to predict when equipment is likely to fail, allowing maintenance just before a fault occurs.
-
Goal: Perform maintenance based on actual equipment condition, avoiding unnecessary work.
-
Tools: Vibration analysis, thermal imaging, oil analysis, IoT sensor data.
3. Corrective Maintenance (CM)
Performed after a failure or fault has occurred to restore equipment to working condition.
-
Goal: Quickly repair or replace broken parts to minimize downtime.
-
Downside: Unplanned and can lead to higher costs if failures are severe.
4. Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM)
A hybrid approach that monitors specific parameters or conditions of equipment continuously and triggers maintenance when certain thresholds are met.
-
Goal: Maintain assets only when needed, based on measurable conditions.
-
Example: Replacing a bearing only when temperature or vibration exceeds safe limits.
5. Proactive Maintenance
Focuses on identifying and eliminating root causes of equipment failure through design improvements, operator training, and environmental controls.
-
Goal: Reduce the chance of failures by addressing underlying issues rather than symptoms.
6. Run-to-Failure Maintenance
Allows equipment to operate until it fails, suitable for non-critical or easily replaceable assets.
-
Goal: Avoid maintenance costs where downtime impact is minimal.
-
Risk: Can cause unexpected production stoppages if not managed properly.
|
Maintenance Type |
When to Use |
Key Benefit |
Typical Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Preventive |
Regular scheduled upkeep |
Reduces unexpected failures |
Time/usage-based scheduled tasks |
|
Predictive |
Critical, sensor-enabled equipment |
Minimize downtime & costs |
Data-driven maintenance alerts |
|
Corrective |
After failure occurs |
Quick restoration |
Reactive repairs |
|
Condition-Based |
Equipment with measurable health indicators |
Targeted maintenance |
Monitoring thresholds |
|
Proactive |
High-impact failure scenarios |
Root cause elimination |
Continuous improvement |
|
Run-to-Failure |
Non-critical assets |
Cost savings |
Operate until failure |
Industries Relying on Strong Equipment Maintenance Management
Equipment maintenance plays a vital role across industries, ensuring operational efficiency, compliance, and asset longevity.
Manufacturing: In both discrete and process manufacturing, equipment uptime is critical. Maintenance systems help streamline workflows, reduce downtime, and ensure regulatory compliance.
Healthcare: Hospitals and healthcare facilities manage complex networks of medical equipment, where regular maintenance ensures patient safety and regulatory readiness.
Utilities and Energy: Utility providers oversee critical infrastructure and rely on maintenance programs to ensure uninterrupted service and compliance with evolving regulations.
Mining: With heavy equipment operating in extreme conditions, mining operations depend on preventive maintenance to avoid costly failures and improve safety.
Food & Beverage: Strict hygiene and safety standards demand reliable equipment in food production. Maintenance programs ensure smooth operations and regulatory compliance.
Pharmaceutical: Pharma companies follow strict FDA standards, requiring detailed equipment maintenance tracking to ensure product integrity and audit readiness.
Retail: Retailers use maintenance systems to manage store equipment and facilities, supporting operational consistency and enhancing customer experience.
Telecom: Telecommunications providers rely on equipment uptime for network reliability. Maintenance tools ensure infrastructure is maintained and disruptions minimized.
The Pivotal Role of MRO Data Management in Modern Maintenance
In modern EMM, data is not just a byproduct; it’s a critical asset. Effective collection, management, and analysis of maintenance-related data are essential for:
Informed Decision-Making: Accurate data on asset history, failure patterns, repair times, and costs allows managers to make better decisions about maintenance strategies, resource allocation, and capital investments.
Optimized Scheduling: Historical data and performance trends help refine PM schedules and predict optimal intervention points for PdM, preventing over-maintenance or under-maintenance.
Improved Efficiency: Access to correct procedures, parts information, and asset history enables technicians to perform repairs more quickly and effectively, increasing “wrench time.”
Root Cause Analysis: Detailed failure data allows for thorough root cause analysis, helping to eliminate recurring problems rather than just treating symptoms.
Cost Control: Tracking maintenance labor, materials, and contractor costs against specific assets and work orders provides visibility into where money is being spent and identifies opportunities for savings.
Continuous Improvement: By measuring KPIs and analyzing trends, maintenance departments can continuously refine their processes and improve overall equipment performance. A centralized information system or a modern Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) / Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system is crucial for managing this data effectively and creating a “single source of truth” for maintenance information.
Strategic Steps for Implementing Effective Equipment Maintenance Management
A structured approach is key to developing a successful data-driven EMM program:
Phase 1: Establishing the Maintenance Data Foundation & Strategy
Step 1: Define Asset Hierarchy and Criticality, and Consolidate Asset Data. Develop a clear asset hierarchy. Identify critical assets based on their impact on production, safety, and cost. Consolidate all existing asset information into a centralized system (e.g., CMMS/EAM).
Step 2: Digitize Key Maintenance Documents and Integrate Information. Use tools like IDP where beneficial to digitize essential maintenance documents (manuals, procedures, historical logs) and integrate this information into the asset records within your maintenance system.
Step 3: Develop Appropriate Maintenance Strategies and KPIs. Based on asset criticality and available data, define the most suitable maintenance strategies (PM, PdM, etc.) for different asset classes. Establish clear, measurable KPIs to track performance.
Phase 2: Planning & Execution with Accurate Information
Step 4: Implement Robust Work Order Planning and Scheduling Processes. Ensure all maintenance work is planned, scheduled, and assigned through a formal work order system. Utilize accurate asset information and Service BOMs for efficient parts and resource planning.
Step 5: Equip Technicians with Necessary Information and Tools for Execution. Provide maintenance teams with easy access (e.g., via mobile devices) to work orders, asset history, SOPs, safety guidelines, and sBOMs to ensure tasks are performed correctly and safely.
Phase 3: Data Capture, Analysis & Continuous Improvement in Maintenance
Step 6: Enforce Consistent Data Capture for All Maintenance Activities. Train technicians and establish processes to ensure all relevant data from maintenance execution (labor, parts, failure codes, corrective actions, etc.) is accurately captured in the work order system.
Step 7: Regularly Analyze Maintenance Data and Performance for Continuous Improvement. Use the reporting and analytics capabilities of your maintenance software to track KPIs, analyze trends, identify root causes of failures, and find opportunities to optimize maintenance strategies, schedules, and resource allocation.
Quantifiable Impact: Data and Calculations in Equipment Maintenance Management
Effective equipment maintenance, underpinned by robust lifecycle data management, delivers significant financial benefits:
The True Cost of Downtime: Unplanned downtime can cost industrial manufacturers $50 billion annually, with some estimates placing the average cost at $125,000 per hour for a typical industrial business.
Calculation Example (Revenue Loss): Downtime (4 hrs) × Production Rate (100 units/hr) × Revenue/Unit ($50) = $20,000 Lost Revenue.
Preventive Maintenance (PM) vs. Reactive Maintenance: The Financial Case: Reactive maintenance can cost 4 to 5 times more than PM. A well-implemented PM program can yield savings of 12% to 18% over reactive approaches and reduce breakdowns by 70-75%.
Calculation Example (PM ROI): If a PM program costing $50K avoids $150K in reactive costs and saves $80K in downtime, the ROI is 360%. (
[($150K + $80K) - $50K] / $50K × 100).
The Advanced Benefits of Predictive Maintenance (PdM): PdM can reduce overall maintenance costs by 5-10% compared to time-based PM, increase equipment uptime by up to 20%, and reduce unplanned downtime by up to 50%.
Optimizing MRO Inventory Management: Inventory carrying costs are typically 20-30% of inventory value annually. Reducing average MRO inventory by $200,000 with a 25% carrying cost saves $50,000 annually. Effective lifecycle data can also reduce obsolete MRO stock by 5-15%.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Their Financial Link:
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
OEE measures manufacturing productivity. It’s a composite metric of Availability, Performance, and Quality.
Formula: OEE = Availability x Performance x Quality
Availability: (Run Time / Planned Production Time)
Performance: (Ideal Cycle Time x Total Count) / Run Time)
Quality: (Good Count / Total Count)
Data Point: World-class OEE is often cited as 85% or higher. Average OEE in many plants is closer to 60-70%.
Calculation: Financial Impact of OEE Improvement
Improving OEE can directly translate to increased production capacity without capital investment.
Example: A plant produces 1,000 units/hour, each unit has a profit margin of $5. Current OEE is 70%.
Potential output at 100% OEE = 1,000 units/hr
Actual output at 70% OEE = 700 units/hr
If OEE improves to 75% (an increase of 5 percentage points):
New output = 750 units/hr
Increase in output = 50 units/hr
Additional profit per hour = 50 units * $5/unit = $250/hour
Annual additional profit (assuming 2,000 operating hours/year) = $250/hour * 2,000 hours = $500,000.
Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO) Inventory Optimization
Holding too much inventory ties up capital; too little leads to extended downtime waiting for parts.
Data Point: Companies can often reduce MRO inventory holdings by 10-30% through better data management, accurate Bill of Materials (BOMs), and demand forecasting, without impacting service levels. Carrying costs for inventory are typically 20-30% of the inventory value per year.
Calculation: Savings from Inventory Reduction
Value of MRO inventory reduction x Annual inventory carrying cost percentage = Annual Savings
Example: A company reduces MRO inventory from $5 million to $4 million (a $1 million reduction) with a carrying cost of 25%: $1,000,000 * 0.25 = $250,000 annual savings in carrying costs.
Calculation: Savings from Reduced Stockouts (Downtime Avoidance)
This is harder to quantify directly but involves estimating the downtime cost avoided by having the right part at the right time.
Example: If having a critical spare part (costing $500) avoids 4 hours of downtime (costing $10,000/hour), the net saving is ($40,000 – $500) = $39,500 for that single instance.
Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) Reduction
The average time taken to repair a failed piece of equipment.
Data Point: Access to accurate information (manuals, procedures, parts lists from sBOMs) and better planning can reduce MTTR by 15-30%.
Calculation: Impact of MTTR Reduction on Availability (and thus OEE & Downtime Cost)
(Old MTTR – New MTTR) x Number of repairs per year = Total repair time saved
This saved time directly translates to reduced downtime costs.
Example: Old MTTR = 6 hours, New MTTR = 4 hours. Number of critical repairs = 50/year.
Time saved per repair = 2 hours
Total repair time saved = 2 hours/repair * 50 repairs = 100 hours
If downtime cost is $10,000/hour, savings = 100 hours * $10,000/hour = $1,000,000.
Technician “Wrench Time”
The proportion of a technician’s time spent directly working on equipment versus traveling, looking for parts, getting instructions, or doing administrative tasks.
Data Point: Industry average wrench time can be as low as 25-35%. Best-in-class can reach 50-60%.
Calculation: Value of Increased Wrench Time
Increased wrench time means more maintenance work can be done with the same number of technicians, or the same amount of work with fewer technicians/less overtime.
Example: A team of 10 technicians works 2,000 hours/year each (20,000 total hours). Labor cost is $50/hour. Current wrench time is 30% (6,000 productive hours).
If wrench time increases to 40% (8,000 productive hours), that’s an additional 2,000 productive hours.
Value of additional productive hours = 2,000 hours * $50/hour = $100,000. This could mean more PMs completed, reducing breakdowns further, or accommodating more work without hiring.
Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ) related to Maintenance
Failures due to poorly maintained equipment can lead to scrap, rework, and defects.
Data Point: CoPQ can represent 5-30% of a company’s revenue (varies widely by industry). A portion of this is often attributable to equipment condition.
Calculation: Savings from Reduced Defects due to Better Maintenance
Reduction in defect rate (attributable to maintenance) x Cost per defect x Production volume = Annual Savings
Example: If better maintenance reduces a defect rate by 0.5%, the cost per defect (scrap/rework) is $100, and annual production is 100,000 units: 0.005 * $100/defect * 100,000 units = $50,000 annual savings.
Maintenance Costs as a Percentage of Replacement Asset Value (%RAV): A common benchmark, with world-class %RAV often between 2% and 5%. Calculated as:
(Total Annual Maintenance Cost / Replacement Asset Value) × 100.
5 Best Practices for Data-Driven Equipment Maintenance
Effective equipment maintenance relies on efficiency, consistency, and the right tools. Following a regular maintenance schedule, keeping detailed logs, using quality parts, and ensuring staff are well-trained all contribute to better performance and fewer breakdowns. Embracing modern maintenance software, like CMMS, can further streamline tasks, reduce downtime, and improve overall equipment reliability.
Create a Master Equipment Register (MER)
Include make, model, location, OEM specs, and asset criticality. Use AI for:
Auto-classification of equipment.
Validation of data against global standards.
Leverage AI for Maintenance Strategy Selection
AI can suggest strategies based on:
MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures).
Criticality analysis.
Historical spend per asset category.
Digitize and Automate Maintenance Schedules
Use software platforms to:
Trigger work orders via sensor data.
Integrate calendars, usage thresholds, and inventory management.
Verdantis’ integration with ERP/CMMS ensures that all scheduling logic is fed with enriched and validated data.
Enforce Data Governance Across Asset Lifecycle
Establish business rules such as:
Mandatory attribute completion.
Naming conventions.
Duplicate checks before material creation.
With Verdantis Integrity™, governance policies are enforced in real time across systems like SAP, Oracle, and Maximo.
Train Technicians Using Structured Data
When equipment manuals are digitized, labeled, and linked to asset records, training becomes streamlined. AI-powered knowledge graphs can match symptoms to likely causes and suggest SOPs.
Equipment Maintenance Management Checklist (AI-Enabled)
|
Area |
AI-Augmented Actions |
|
Visual Inspection |
Computer vision to detect anomalies (e.g., leaks, corrosion) |
|
Lubrication |
Smart sensors alert on lubrication cycles |
|
Calibration |
Auto-scheduled events triggered by sensor drift |
|
Fluid Levels |
IoT sensors with real-time dashboards |
|
Electrical Systems |
Pattern recognition for predictive failures |
|
Filters, Belts |
RFID/Barcode tracking for replacement cycles |
|
Record-Keeping |
Blockchain-based immutable logs |
The Technical Imperative: Why EMM Matters
Minimizing Unscheduled Downtime
Technologies such as CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management Systems) and EAM (Enterprise Asset Management) platforms are only as effective as the underlying asset data. Missing part numbers, inconsistent descriptions, or legacy naming conventions can delay service requests and cause inventory mismatches. An AI-based MDM solution ensures that:
Assets are uniquely identified and classified.
BOM (Bill of Materials) is clean and validated.
Spare parts are not duplicated across multiple codes.
Extending Equipment Life Through Data Consistency
Maintenance strategies like predictive and proactive maintenance depend heavily on historical performance metrics. Without harmonized data, trend analysis is skewed. AI-enriched data models from platforms like Verdantis clean and normalize legacy data, enabling better lifecycle analysis and replacement planning.
Enhancing Safety Compliance
Poorly documented equipment or ambiguous material records can result in safety lapses. When equipment metadata includes incorrect voltage, pressure ratings, or lubrication types, the risk of human error increases. Through classification, normalization, and attribute enrichment, Verdantis ensures complete and reliable metadata for all maintenance-critical assets.
Reducing Cost via Inventory Optimization
Inventory-related inefficiencies—such as overstocking spares or delays due to unavailable critical parts—can be mitigated by data standardization. Accurate UNSPSC or eCl@ss classification allows for spend analysis, vendor rationalization, and buffer stock optimization.
Equipment Maintenance Examples: Illustrating Data-Driven Success
Manufacturing Plant (CNC Machines): By integrating operational data and sBOMs within a lifecycle data platform, a plant optimized PM schedules for its CNC machines. Analysis of historical failure data linked to specific component lots (identified through lifecycle BOM tracing) allowed them to proactively replace susceptible parts, reducing unexpected failures by 30% and improving part quality.
Energy Provider (Transformers): A utility leveraged lifecycle data (design specs, operational load history, maintenance records, IDP-captured inspection reports) to build predictive models for transformer failures. This led to a 25% improvement in predicting failures, allowing for proactive repairs and avoiding costly widespread outages.
Food & Beverage (Packaging Lines): Using accurate as-maintained BOMs and maintenance histories, a food processor identified a recurring issue with a specific sealer model across multiple lines. Data analysis within their lifecycle platform pinpointed a material incompatibility originating from a design update. Addressing this root cause improved OEE by 8% on those lines.
Real-World Impact (Generic Example): A large industrial facility, by implementing a new lubrication solution (a specific maintenance improvement identified through data analysis), significantly reduced maintenance costs and downtime. This led to a 60% decline in bearing changes, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars annually and preventing millions in lost production from averted downtime. Effective data management is key to identifying and scaling such improvements.
Verdantis: Mastering Equipment Data Across the Lifecycle for Optimized Maintenance
Verdantis empowers organizations to take control of their asset data throughout its entire lifecycle. By providing a robust platform for data aggregation, contextualization, and analysis, Verdantis ensures that maintenance activities are not performed in a silo but are informed by, and contribute to, a holistic understanding of asset performance, cost, and risk from design to disposal.
Key ways Verdantis’s Lifecycle Data Management platform enhances equipment maintenance include:
Integrated View of Work Order Data and Execution Intelligence: While maintenance execution might occur in specialized systems (CMMS/EAM), Verdantis provides a master view, integrating work order data (tasks, labor, parts consumed, failure codes) with the asset’s complete lifecycle record.
Technical Aspects: Aggregates data from various sources, links it to specific asset configurations, design revisions, operational history, and BOMs. This allows for sophisticated trend analysis, cost roll-ups, and performance benchmarking beyond typical CMMS capabilities.
Impact: Enables identification of design-related recurring failures or correlation of maintenance costs with operational profiles. For example, by analyzing aggregated work order data across a fleet within Verdantis, a company identified that assets from a particular manufacturing batch incurred 30% higher maintenance costs for a specific component, leading to a supplier quality review.
Comprehensive Asset Information Management (The Digital Asset Record): Verdantis serves as the central hub for all critical asset information – the definitive digital asset record. This includes design data, engineering specifications, as-built vs. as-maintained configurations, material traceability, operational parameters, safety procedures, and complete maintenance history.
Technical Aspects: Version control, change management, linking to related documents (CAD files, manuals, certificates), and robust data governance are key.
Impact: Ensures maintenance teams always work with accurate, up-to-date information, reducing errors and improving safety. For example, having the correct version of an asset’s configuration available in Verdantis before a major overhaul can prevent the ordering of incorrect critical spares, saving significant cost and time.
Data-Driven Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Strategies By analyzing comprehensive lifecycle data within Verdantis, organizations can develop highly optimized PM schedules and more accurate PdM models. Data from design (expected lifespan of components), manufacturing (quality metrics), and operations (stress factors, sensor readings) can refine maintenance predictions.
Impact: Moving beyond time-based PMs to condition- and reliability-centered maintenance informed by a richer dataset. A utility using Verdantis could analyze historical failure data correlated with specific operational conditions across its transformer fleet, leading to a predictive model that improved failure detection lead time by 40%.
Holistic MRO Inventory and Bill of Materials (BOM) Data Management Verdantis ensures that Bill of Materials (from engineering BOMs to service BOMs) and MRO inventory data are accurate, consistent, and linked to the asset record throughout its lifecycle.
Technical Aspects: Manages the evolution of BOMs, links them to specific asset instances and configurations, and provides visibility into critical spare parts, interchangeability, and obsolescence by integrating with ERP/inventory systems.
Impact: Reduces the risk of using incorrect parts, optimizes MRO inventory levels based on actual asset lifecycle needs, and speeds up repair planning. Knowing the precise ‘as-maintained’ BOM for an asset managed in Verdantis can reduce part identification time during emergency repairs by over 50%.
Calculation Example: If an incorrect part is ordered due to outdated BOM information, leading to 8 hours of additional downtime for a critical asset valued at $20,000/hour, the cost is $160,000. Centralized, accurate BOM data in Verdantis helps prevent such occurrences.
Advanced Analytics and Reporting on Lifecycle Performance Verdantis offers powerful analytics tools to derive insights from the vast dataset it manages. This includes Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) correlated with lifecycle factors, total cost of ownership, and asset reliability trends.
Impact: Supports strategic decision-making for asset investment, refurbishment, or retirement, based on comprehensive lifecycle cost and performance data.
Leveraging Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) for Maintenance Records: Maintenance departments often grapple with vast amounts of information locked in diverse, often unstructured documents such as PDF manuals, scanned historical work orders, supplier invoices for parts, inspection reports, and images.
Technical Aspects: IDP utilizes AI technologies like Optical Character Recognition (OCR), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Machine Learning (ML) to automatically extract, interpret, and structure key data fields (e.g., part numbers from invoices, serial numbers from scanned forms, fault codes from technician notes, measurements from inspection sheets) from these varied formats. This structured data can then be automatically fed into maintenance management systems.
Impact: IDP drastically reduces manual data entry, minimizes human error, and makes valuable information from previously inaccessible documents searchable and usable. This enriches asset history, improves data quality for analytics, speeds up invoice processing for MRO parts, and helps digitize legacy maintenance knowledge. For example, automatically processing technician-completed inspection checklists can reduce data entry time by up to 80% and ensure compliance data is captured accurately.
Conclusion
Effective Equipment Maintenance Management is a critical driver of operational success. By moving beyond reactive approaches and embracing data-driven strategies, standardized processes, and modern information systems, organizations can significantly enhance equipment reliability, reduce operational costs, improve safety, and boost overall productivity. A commitment to capturing accurate data, analyzing performance, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement will ensure that the maintenance function contributes maximum value to the business.
What People Ask
What are the core components of an Equipment Maintenance Management system?
Core components include asset management (registry, history), work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, MRO inventory management, resource management (labor), reporting/analytics, and often mobile capabilities.
How much should an organization invest in equipment maintenance?
This varies, but a common benchmark is 2-5% of the Replacement Asset Value (RAV) annually. Investment should be driven by achieving reliability goals and optimizing total cost of ownership, rather than just minimizing upfront maintenance spend.
How can we improve technician productivity in maintenance?
By providing clear work orders, easy access to accurate information (manuals, history, parts via sBOMs), proper tools, efficient scheduling, minimizing travel/wait times, and continuous training.
What's the difference between a CMMS and an EAM system?
A CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System) primarily focuses on maintenance operations: work orders, PMs, and MRO inventory. An EAM (Enterprise Asset Management) system has a broader scope, often encompassing the entire asset lifecycle from procurement/installation through operation, maintenance, and disposal, including financial tracking, MRO procurement, and sometimes aspects like project management or HSE (Health, Safety, Environment) modules. Modern EAMs have strong data management capabilities critical for advanced EMM.
